Skip to main content

Snowflake v/s Databricks

 Explore Snowflake v/s Databricks:

Snowflake and Databricks are two popular platforms in the field of data analytics and processing, but they serve different purposes and offer distinct features. Let us explore Snowflake and Databricks:


  • Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing platform that provides a scalable and highly performant environment for storing and analyzing structured data.
  • It is specifically designed for data warehousing and is known for its separation of storage and compute, enabling elastic scaling and cost optimization.
  • Snowflake offers SQL-based querying capabilities, allowing users to perform complex analytics on large volumes of structured data.
  • It supports data integration from various sources and provides features for data loading, transformation, and management.
  • Snowflake provides robust security features, including data encryption, role-based access control, and auditing capabilities.
  • It is highly scalable and can handle massive amounts of data, making it suitable for enterprise-level data warehousing and analytics.


  • Databricks is a unified analytics platform that combines data processing, machine learning, and collaborative coding capabilities.
  • It is built on top of Apache Spark and provides an optimized environment for large-scale data processing, analytics, and machine learning tasks.
  • Databricks offers collaborative notebooks where users can write and execute code in languages like Python, R, SQL, and Scala.
  • It supports real-time streaming data processing, allowing users to analyze and derive insights from streaming data sources.
  • Databricks provides built-in machine learning libraries and tools, making it easier to develop and deploy machine learning models at scale.
  • It offers seamless integration with other data sources and tools, making it suitable for end-to-end data analytics workflows.
  • Databricks provides a collaborative and interactive environment, enabling data scientists and data engineers to work together efficiently.

Here are some key differences between the two

Data Storage: Snowflake is primarily a data warehousing platform, while Databricks is a unified analytics platform that supports data processing, machine learning, and analytics. Snowflake provides a scalable and flexible solution for storing large volumes of structured and semi-structured data, while Databricks allows users to process and analyze both structured and unstructured data.

Data Processing: Snowflake provides SQL-based data processing capabilities, while Databricks offers a wide range of data processing tools, including SQL, Python, R, and Scala, as well as machine learning frameworks such as Apache Spark and TensorFlow.

Real-time Data Processing: Databricks provides real-time streaming data processing capabilities through integration with Apache Kafka, while Snowflake does not currently offer native support for real-time data processing.

Pricing Model: Snowflake offers a pay-per-use pricing model based on data storage and compute usage, while Databricks offers a subscription-based pricing model based on the number of active users.

Security and Compliance: Both Snowflake and Databricks provide enterprise-level security features, including data encryption, network isolation, and access controls, to ensure data security and compliance with industry regulations.

In summary, Snowflake is primarily focused on data warehousing and analytics for structured data, while Databricks provides a broader platform for data processing, analytics, machine learning, and collaboration.

The choice between Snowflake and Databricks depends on specific requirements, data types, and the nature of analytics tasks to be performed. In some cases, organizations may even choose to use both platforms in conjunction to leverage their respective strengths.


Popular posts from this blog

MySQL InnoDB cluster troubleshooting | commands

Cluster Validation: select * from performance_schema.replication_group_members; All members should be online. select instance_name, mysql_server_uuid, addresses from  mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata.instances; All instances should return same value for mysql_server_uuid SELECT @@GTID_EXECUTED; All nodes should return same value Frequently use commands: mysql> SET SQL_LOG_BIN = 0;  mysql> stop group_replication; mysql> set global super_read_only=0; mysql> drop database mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata; mysql> RESET MASTER; mysql> RESET SLAVE ALL; JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster() JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster("<Cluster_name>") JS > var cluster = dba.createCluster('name') JS > cluster.removeInstance('root@<IP_Address>:<Port_No>',{force: true}) JS > cluster.addInstance('root@<IP add>,:<port>') JS > cluster.addInstance('root@ <IP add>,:<port> ') JS > dba.getC

MySQL slave Error_code: 1032 | MySQL slave drift | HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND

MySQL slave Error_code: 1032 | MySQL slave drift: With several MySQL, instance with master slave replication, I have one analytics MySQL, environment which is larger in terabytes, compared to other MySQL instances in the environment. Other MySQL instances with terabytes of data are running fine master, slave replication. But this analytics environment get started generating slave Error_code :1032. mysql> show slave status; Near relay log: Error_code: 1032; Can't find record in '<table_name>', Error_code: 1032; handler error HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND; the event's master log <name>-bin.000047, end_log_pos 5255306 Near master section: Could not execute Update_rows event on table <db_name>.<table_name>; Can't find record in '<table_name>', Error_code: 1032; Can't find record in '<table_name>', Error_code: 1032; handler error HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND; the event's master log <name>-bin.000047, end_l

MySQL dump partition | backup partition | restore partition

MySQL dump Partition and import partition: $ mysqldump --user=root --password=<code> \ -S/mysql/<db_name>/data/<db_name>.sock --set-gtid-purged=OFF - -no-create-info \ <db_name> <table_name> --where="datetime between 'YYYY-MM-DD'  and 'YYYY-MM-DD'"  \  > /mysql/backup/<partition_name>.sql Where data type is bigint for partition, it will dump DDL for table also: $ mysqldump -uroot -p -S/mysql/mysql.sock --set-gtid-purged=OFF  \ <db_name> <table_name> --where="ENDDATE" between '20200801000000' and '20201101000000' \  > /mysql/dump/<schema_name>.<table_name>.sql   Alter table and add partitions which are truncated: Note: In following case partition 2018_MAY and 2018_JUN were truncated, so we need to reorganize the partition which is just after the desired partition. ALTER TABLE <table_name> REORGANIZE PARTITION 2018_JUL INTO ( PARTITION 2018_MAY VALUES LESS TH