Skip to main content

Explore Amazon Redshift v/s GCP Big Query

Explore Amazon Redshift v/s GCP Big Query:

Both Amazon Redshift and Google BigQuery are popular cloud-based data warehousing solutions. While they have similarities in terms of their purpose and functionality, there are also key differences between the two. Here's a comparison of some features of Amazon Redshift and Google BigQuery:

Architecture and Scaling:

Amazon Redshift: Redshift is built on a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture, designed for online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads. It uses columnar storage and compression techniques to optimize query performance. Redshift allows you to scale compute and storage resources independently with its auto-scaling feature, allowing you to add or remove nodes as needed.

Google BigQuery: BigQuery utilizes a distributed, columnar storage system known as Capacitor. It is designed for handling large-scale data analytics workloads. BigQuery automatically scales compute and storage resources based on demand, eliminating the need for manual scaling. It leverages Google's infrastructure to provide high-performance querying.

Data Loading and Integration:

Amazon Redshift: Redshift offers multiple options for data loading, including bulk data import/export using Amazon S3, COPY command, AWS Data Pipeline, AWS Glue, and more. It integrates well with other AWS services, allowing seamless data transfer between various data sources.

Google BigQuery: BigQuery supports data ingestion through batch loads using CSV, JSON, Avro, or Parquet files, as well as streaming inserts for real-time data. It integrates with Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Dataflow, and Google Cloud Dataproc, enabling seamless data transfer and processing within the GCP ecosystem.

Querying and SQL Support:

Amazon Redshift: Redshift supports standard SQL queries with several advanced features. It provides window functions, common table expressions (CTEs), complex analytical functions, and user-defined functions (UDFs). Redshift also offers query optimization techniques like query rewriting, distribution keys, and sort keys to improve query performance.

Google BigQuery: BigQuery supports a variant of SQL known as BigQuery SQL, which is similar to standard SQL with some additional features and functions specific to BigQuery. It provides support for nested and repeated fields, user-defined functions (UDFs), and advanced analytics functions. BigQuery automatically optimizes query execution and parallelizes queries across multiple nodes.

Data Partitioning and Clustering:

Amazon Redshift: Redshift allows you to define sort keys and distribution keys when creating tables. Sort keys determine the physical order of data within each node, optimizing query performance for range-based operations. Distribution keys control how data is distributed across nodes, enabling efficient parallel processing.

Google BigQuery: BigQuery utilizes a columnar storage format that automatically manages data organization. It does not require explicit partitioning or clustering keys. BigQuery's storage format allows it to scan and process only the required columns for a query, reducing the data scanned and improving performance.

Data Security and Access Control:

Amazon Redshift: Redshift offers various security features, including encryption at rest using AWS Key Management Service (KMS), encryption in transit using SSL/TLS, Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) support, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) integration for fine-grained access control, and integration with AWS CloudTrail for auditing.

Google BigQuery: BigQuery provides encryption at rest using Google Cloud Key Management Service (KMS) and encryption in transit using SSL/TLS. It integrates with Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM) for access control and supports fine-grained access controls at the project, dataset, and table levels. BigQuery also provides audit logs for monitoring and compliance.

Managed Service and Pricing Model:

Amazon Redshift: Redshift is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS manages the underlying infrastructure, including hardware provisioning, software patching, backups, and maintenance. Redshift's pricing model is based on instance types, provisioned storage, and data transfer.

Google BigQuery: BigQuery is a fully managed service provided by Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Google manages the infrastructure, including hardware provisioning, software updates, backups, and maintenance. BigQuery's pricing model is based on storage usage, query data processed (on a per TB basis), and streaming inserts.

It's important to note that both Redshift and BigQuery have additional features and capabilities beyond what's covered here. The choice between the two depends on your specific requirements, existing infrastructure, data volume, performance needs, cloud provider preference, and cost considerations. Evaluating and benchmarking both platforms with your own data and use cases is recommended before making a decision.

Wish you happy learning, please share your opinion so I can make it better.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MySQL InnoDB cluster troubleshooting | commands

Cluster Validation: select * from performance_schema.replication_group_members; All members should be online. select instance_name, mysql_server_uuid, addresses from  mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata.instances; All instances should return same value for mysql_server_uuid SELECT @@GTID_EXECUTED; All nodes should return same value Frequently use commands: mysql> SET SQL_LOG_BIN = 0;  mysql> stop group_replication; mysql> set global super_read_only=0; mysql> drop database mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata; mysql> RESET MASTER; mysql> RESET SLAVE ALL; JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster() JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster("<Cluster_name>") JS > var cluster = dba.createCluster('name') JS > cluster.removeInstance('root@<IP_Address>:<Port_No>',{force: true}) JS > cluster.addInstance('root@<IP add>,:<port>') JS > cluster.addInstance('root@ <IP add>,:<port> ') JS > dba.getC...
Post a Comment
Read more

MySQL slave Error_code: 1032 | MySQL slave drift | HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND

MySQL slave Error_code: 1032 | MySQL slave drift: With several MySQL, instance with master slave replication, I have one analytics MySQL, environment which is larger in terabytes, compared to other MySQL instances in the environment. Other MySQL instances with terabytes of data are running fine master, slave replication. But this analytics environment get started generating slave Error_code :1032. mysql> show slave status; Near relay log: Error_code: 1032; Can't find record in '<table_name>', Error_code: 1032; handler error HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND; the event's master log <name>-bin.000047, end_log_pos 5255306 Near master section: Could not execute Update_rows event on table <db_name>.<table_name>; Can't find record in '<table_name>', Error_code: 1032; Can't find record in '<table_name>', Error_code: 1032; handler error HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND; the event's master log <name>-bin.000047, end_l...
2 comments
Read more

InnoDB cluster Remove Instance Force | Add InnoDB instance

InnoDB cluster environment UUID is different on node: To fix it stop group replication, remove instance (use force if require), add instance back Identify the node which is not in sync: Execute following SQL statement on each node and identify the node has different UUID on all nodes. mysql> select * from mysql_innodb_cluster_metadata.instances; Stop group replication: Stop group replication on the node which does not have same UUID on all nodes. mysql > stop GROUP_REPLICATION; Remove instances from cluster: Remove all secondary node from the cluster and add them back if require. $mysqlsh JS >\c root@<IP_Address>:<Port_No> JS > dba.getCluster().status() JS > dba.getCluster () <Cluster:cluster_name> JS > var cluster = dba.getCluster("cluster_name"); JS >  cluster.removeInstance('root@<IP_Address>:<Port_No>'); If you get "Cluster.removeInstance: Timeout reached waiting......" JS > cluster.removeInstance(...
2 comments
Read more